<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1574985177565874&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Skip to content
Sign up for monthly email updates of faith and science articles from Magis Center!
A man covered in paint.
Bill SchmittSeptember 24, 202610 min read

Practical Wisdom v. Artificial Intelligence: 7 Ways Humans Win at Work

AI can out-calculate us, but it can't out-live us. The advantage humans still hold at work isn't raw processing power; it's practical wisdom, what philosophers call phronesis: judgment shaped by experience, values, and love. Here are seven ways that wisdom still wins.

One could write a syllabus to redirect us toward "workarounds" for the resignation so many feel about AI and work. Proper study would refresh us in theology and philosophy—and practically all the sciences, humanities, and liberal arts. (Magis Center's own Institute for Teachers and Catechists offers exactly this kind of grounding.) Instead of merely preparing for victory in the job market, imaginative students would envision a vast, vocal community, a dynamic workforce, seeking win-win engagement in the "marketplace of ideas."

A first, less rigorous step toward this worldview could consist of lively discussion—and prayer—centered on the context we see around us. It can inspire a list of new ideas about purposeful vocations yet to arise.

We're hesitant to plunge into the mysteries of silicon or soul because our digital ecology is clouded by the confusing rush of AI advancements, as well as social media and related forces dividing and distracting us. However, we should be buoyed by a distinctive advantage humanity has over any rival who strategically inclines us toward the false “bliss” of ignorance. That advantage is the virtue of practical wisdom, or phronesis, a theme Magis Center has explored in its own writing on what intelligence really is.

Here is a list of seven inklings or premises for discussing strategies of our own.

Note that some of the background material for these notions about the work world has come from AI itself. This proves our absence of Luddite intentions to exclude online resources from the learning process. Chatbots do have their proper place! We should utilize their cajoling facilitation of research to retain what Pope Leo XIV has called the “grandeur” of our humanity (in his 2026 encyclical on AI, Magnifica Humanitas).

AI can out-calculate us, but it can't out-live us. Here are seven ways humans still win at work:

  • Habits of the Mind: Critical Thinking Over Algorithmic Thinking
  • Democracy and the Public Square: Why Human Storytelling Still Matters
  • Who Shall Manage, and How? The Case for Human Judgment
  • The Creative and the Offbeat: What AI "Slop" Can't Replace
  • We All Have Something to Do: Purpose Beyond Productivity
  • Job Seekers, Look for Possibilities: 832 Jobs and Counting
  • Onward to Victory: What Rudy Teaches Us About Winning at Work

1. Habits of the Mind: Critical Thinking Over Algorithmic Thinking

People who anticipate a "job search" or employee evaluation in their future typically jot down their major assets and "areas for improvement." This venture in critical thinking can tap into the insights of Sydney Harris, the journalist who was quoted earlier prophesying the risk of machine-like cognition.

Writing during the old days of mainframes, Harris voiced concern that bureaucrats, technocrats, and media were leading us to "reshape work and culture," to compress thoughtful service into algorithmic systems. He warned society had begun prioritizing "efficiency over wisdom. . . rules over judgment. . [and] metrics over meaning," as Bing Co-Pilot reports.

The chatbot links us up to an additional, unnamed commentator at Fixquotes.com who gained inspiration from Harris. He proudly asserted that "human thinking is messy" because it relies on "empathy, memory, contradiction, and a tolerance for ambiguity." When we mimic a computer instead, we're "outsourcing judgment."

2. Democracy and the Public Square: Why Human Storytelling Still Matters

Harris advised his readers to preserve the "democratic ideal of the mind," which prizes human experience and understanding over imposed standardization. Machine-shaped intelligence optimizes, categorizes, and simply "complies," he observed. This short-circuits the profound edification civic-minded humans receive through storytelling.

Authentic stories shared in the public square illuminate history and diverse perspectives, adding nuance. While maintaining a healthy skepticism, we come to respect perspectives and aspirations. Values held in common bring us closer together.

Now in 2026, Americans with their omnipresent screens are more likely to boil down individuals' identities into one-size-fits-all categories, patterns, and labels. We spontaneously summarize people's worldviews as "oppressor-vs.-oppressed" (which is a secular contortion of spiritual welfare) or "the will to power" (which is a substitute for God).

Such oversimplification cannot align with America's founders, who celebrated human dignity and freedom. They preferred a form of governance that slowed down the pace through organized checks and balances. George Washington worried that political parties would form "factions" focused on quick triumphs, thereby weakening a deliberative republic.

3. Who Shall Manage, and How? The Case for Human Judgment

A spontaneous society should think twice about "hiring" AI's dumbed-down disciples for certain kinds of positions in the private sector. Managers need emotional intelligence and patience to "read a room" and "lead a room." Gatekeepers in the media, who must guard against sloppy content, still must set their smart journalistic watchdogs free for unpredictable truth-seeking so they can generate scoops, not spin. AI, in contrast, is eerily good at spin and charmingly suited for propaganda.

Numerous jobs will always require humans who can be messy without being sloppy. Enthusiastic workers will hyperlink rapidly between ideas not because they're predicting the next word in a sentence, but because they're seeing a "bigger picture" take shape. Audiences will gather around them because they're adding deeper knowledge, not only more knowledge; they tell compelling stories with well-considered narrative arcs that enlighten.

Top employees must have a knack for innovating, imagining better approaches, and asking questions if something doesn't feel right.

A new study by the Wharton School of Business, cited from a human-resources website, has named a disturbing trend—"cognitive surrender." Workers with higher trust in AI proved more likely to follow a computer's advice, without pushing back, even though Wharton's researchers had programmed it to produce information that was wrong.

4. The Creative and the Offbeat: What AI "Slop" Can't Replace

Workers called "creatives" in various art forms should advocate that we be wary of expanding culture's current fascination with videos, music, and other entertainment served up by AI. This "slop" can lead to a degrading and discouraging waste of authentic talents conjoined with the creator.

People inclined toward science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)—like those embracing STEAM (with arts added) or STREAM (with religiosity added)—might not always win popularity as "normies" or "hail fellows well met." But may God help us if we replace these "hidden figures," or people with various kinds of "beautiful minds," with AI.

Many of the offbeat folks whom we perceive as sailing in an unusual stream or broadcasting on an unusual spectrum nevertheless have the potential to save a careless swimmer from drowning or to shine a piercing beacon that lights a drifter's way.

It makes no sense to force people into manual or menial labor, or to marginalize the poor and vulnerable, if their gifts are elsewhere or hard to categorize. AI may be able to do a job more cheaply, but who are we to prefer AI when, in some cases, we know less about that machine's maneuvers than we know about a creature of God?

5. We All Have Something to Do: Purpose Beyond Productivity

As a matter of principle, personal differences are precious because they're embodied in a person. Judeo-Christian tradition declares we are made in the "image and likeness of God." We all have a role in the drama which the ultimate Creative is writing for his human family.

The well-curated Catholic resource called Magis AI discusses this further, helping us to see that humanity's true happiness resides at a game table where only we are dealt the cards. Personal suffering, dependence, and diminishment are "places where trust, compassion, humility, and self-gift can deepen," becoming occasions for "communion, friendship, and sanctification." Magis Center explores this same territory at length in its writing on purpose and vocation, including a piece on the noble vocation of the business leader that applies these ideas directly to the workplace.

The chatbot implies that everyone loses if elites at the table are playing with a poker face. Unlike advanced AI, when mankind exercises love and care for all, including "the least of these," the Magis Center says, we can "humanize both the one served and the one who serves."

More urgently, Arthur C. Brooks, a Harvard policy scholar and noted commentator on happiness and meaning in life, has suggested we have only two options: If AI does not make us better humans, it will destroy us. Pope Leo XIV made a version of this same argument in Magnifica Humanitas, which frames the safeguarding of human dignity as the real measure of any technology's worth.

6. Job Seekers, Look for Possibilities: 832 Jobs and Counting

After all these reflections and discussions, we should approach our fear of tomorrow's universal job search with a sense of duty and hope.

Google AI directs us to the "Occupation Finder" website of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Here, one can search through 832 positions which humans hold—and should retain in some form. The list extends from "adhesive bonding machine operators" through "nursing assistants and orderlies" to "zoology professors (see: post-secondary teachers)."

We can welcome AI as a "tool" which informs us in the the hundreds of expertise areas. Take heart, the list might very well grow as discoveries mount. However, artificial stockpiles of knowledge should trigger concern when they become expert "agents" empowered to decide and accomplish mind-BOGGLING things. Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence might gain the capacity to boggle minds in twisted chaos.

AI has no legitimate claim to "agency" which can override our traits, replace our contributions, or diminish our dignity. If its vaunted pursuit of answers to the world's toughest problems leads a device one day to ask us employees, "Who do you say is your boss?" or "What do you think you're doing?", we need a good rejoinder in defense of human agency. Let's word it in the form of a question that sends AI back to 16th-century wisdom: "Please explain—and implement—the poem-prayer of St. Teresa of Avila."

7. Onward to Victory: What Rudy Teaches Us About Winning at Work

As a confidence-booster, imagine confronting a bossy bot by retrieving the screenplay from the 1993 film Rudy. Ideally, the bot might learn from the genuine human storytelling here, but it probably can't grok it. (By the way, similar lessons could accrue from The Odyssey, although the bot may not have been trained on the film yet.)

Bing Co-Pilot tells us this about the Rudy plot:

A kid named Daniel "Rudy" Ruettiger dreams of playing football for Notre Dame "despite having neither the size, the grades, nor the money to make it seem possible." Overcoming setbacks, he "shows his grit" and makes the team's practice squad.

Bing goes on: "Rudy is allowed to wear the Notre Dame uniform for the last home game of the season," and he records a quarterback sack in the closing moments. "The team carries him off on their shoulders," and he achieves his dream—"not because he became a star athlete, but because he refused to quit."

This makes us recall the church scene where advisor Father Cavanaugh muses with Rudy, "Son, in 35 years of religious study, I have only come up with two hard, incontrovertible facts—There is a God, and. . . I am not Him." The priest has found fulfillment through serving others and sharing what he believes to be true.

So, let this proposition conclude our discussion of humanity: Both Cavanaugh and Rudy have garnered insights which stand the test of time, which can wake up echoes guiding heroic job searches for which we're destined. The film has shown us plenty of "Help Wanted" signs reflecting life's messy path. Nevertheless, we can grasp a meaning here that a rival AI team would not. With God's help, the human family can always devise workarounds! This is no time for "going out of business."

avatar
Bill Schmitt
Bill Schmitt is a journalist, educator, and marketing communications specialist who has been an adjunct professor of English and media at several schools, most recently Holy Cross College in Notre Dame, IN. He served on the communications staff of the University of Notre Dame from 2003 to 2017, managing many projects and joining in a wide range of multimedia, interdisciplinary collaborations. Since then, his freelance work has included feature-writing, editing, podcasting, and blogging, with much of his work centered on the Catholic faith. Bill holds a BA from Fordham University and an MPA from the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs. Find his work at billschmitt.substack.com, OnWord.net, and billschmitt-onword on Linked-In.

RELATED ARTICLES